Comments on: Firefox ignores Vista's Parental Controls and lets Kids download Porn

By: kvizz

kvizz — Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:58:36 +0000

nice work FF i think that FF is not supposed to have all vista features inside and i think that there are extensions that allow you to have some kind of parental control

By: Smurfy

Smurfy — Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:08:46 +0000

I totally agree with Martinimix, why should Firefox be forced to meet with Vista's restrictions when Vista is pro-explorer anyways? Doesn't make sense for Mozilla to actually try to fix this "bug".

By: Martinimix

Martinimix — Sat, 02 Jun 2007 21:19:08 +0000

It's FireFox, one of the best browsers on the net. If it doesn't meet Vista's PC's, then it just means it has a neutrality factor in the way it was made. Of course, I support that Mozilla patch it so the PC's work in Vista, but to make a browser specific to the competition's needs is another entirely different story.

By: Xyc0

Xyc0 — Sat, 02 Jun 2007 18:54:36 +0000

Firefox has it's own parental controls that are more efficient in tracking a minor's progress through the web. Parents have more context specific methods of prevention as well as remote notification.

By: samuel

samuel — Sat, 02 Jun 2007 17:20:56 +0000

Wat is the use of windows parental controls. Just a way of showing universal UI for all application in windows as all the implementation requires to be done at the software.